COLUMBUS, Ohio – A new Ohio House bill, introduced this month is drawing sharp criticism from progressive circles for its stringent measures targeting employers who hire unauthorized workers. The bill aims to impose severe sanctions on businesses that employ individuals deemed “unauthorized aliens” under federal immigration laws.
The proposed legislation, spearheaded by Representative Thomas Patton, seeks to establish multiple sanctions against employers found to be knowingly or purposely hiring unauthorized workers. It stipulates that no employer should employ an unauthorized alien or contract with entities that do so. If enacted, the bill would hold employers accountable even if they use independent contractors or subcontractors who hire unauthorized workers.
The bill outlines the following punishments for employers who violate its provisions:
- Civil Penalties: Employers found to be in violation of the bill may face substantial fines. These fines are intended to penalize employers who knowingly or purposely hire unauthorized workers or contract with entities that do so.
- Revocation of Business Licenses: Employers could have their business licenses revoked or suspended, which would significantly impact their ability to operate legally within the state.
- Injunctions: The bill allows for the imposition of legal injunctions against employers, prohibiting them from engaging in business activities until they comply with the law.
- Criminal Charges: In severe cases, employers may face criminal charges for repeated or egregious violations, leading to possible imprisonment or other criminal penalties.
Critics argue that this bill could lead to discriminatory practices and exacerbate the already strained relations between immigrant workers and their employers. They believe the stringent measures might foster an environment of fear, making it more difficult for immigrants to find work and potentially leading to unjust punishments for businesses struggling to navigate complex immigration laws.
The bill is currently in the early stages of the legislative process and has sparked significant debate on its potential impact on both the local economy and immigrant communities.
