Manchester City have been facing 115 charges of financial misconduct since February 2023, with allegations covering a nine-year period from 2009 to 2018. A 12-week independent hearing concluded in December 2024, but a verdict has not yet arrived. If City are found guilty, finance expert Kieran Maguire has suggested a points deduction of between 40 and 60 is the most logical punishment. A deduction at the top of that range would send City to the bottom of the table. The question of when it lands matters as much as the number itself.
With Premiership odds tracking every twist in what is already the most compelling title race in years, the timing has never been more consequential.
The case for docking points now
The most straightforward argument for why City should be docked points now is simply because the hearing concluded over a year ago. Every match City have played since then has been contested under a cloud, and every point they have accumulated could be seen as tainted. Clubs fighting for European places or survival have lost ground to a side that may have built its era on financial wrongdoing. The longer the punishment is deferred, the more those clubs are disadvantaged.
There is also a precedent problem. Everton and Nottingham Forest were docked points mid-season for their own financial breaches, with no provision to carry the punishment forward. Applying a different framework for City, simply because the scale is larger or the timing is awkward, sets an uncomfortable double standard that smaller clubs would rightly resent.
Tottenham and West Ham, both scrapping for survival at the wrong end of the table in the Premier League relegation odds, would be mathematically safe overnight. For clubs that have spent months looking over their shoulders, that is an enormous relief.
The problem is what comes with it. The title race ends instantly, handing Arsenal their first league championship in over two decades without kicking another ball. For Spurs fans, that outcome stings almost as much as relegation would. Watching their fiercest rivals lift the trophy by default, off the back of a points deduction rather than a title-winning run, is its own kind of misery.
Should the deduction wait?
At the time of writing, a 60-point deduction would leave City on just one point, certain to be relegated. They would then enter the Championship on zero points alongside every other club and, with the resources at their disposal, would almost certainly come straight back up. A one-season absence from the Premier League is painful, but it is survivable.
Carrying a 60-point deduction into next season creates a different kind of problem for City. They would begin 2026-27 on minus 60, needing to win every match simply to approach a points total that keeps them out of the bottom. Relegation would be almost certain regardless of what happens on the pitch. If City are then unable to breakeven, they may even begin the following season in the Championship on minus points, and would not realistically return to the Premier League until 2028 at the earliest.
Dropping into the Championship would also strip City of the revenue streams that keep the club’s operation afloat. Parachute payments exist, but they do not compensate for the loss of Premier League broadcasting rights, reduced commercial appeal, and the reluctance of elite players to sign for a second-tier club.
—
A mid-season deduction this campaign solves one problem and creates several others. It hands Arsenal the title without a fight and creates chaos for a division mid-cycle. Carrying the punishment into 2026-27 is the harder outcome for City long-term. It forces the club to rebuild from a position that no amount of money can quickly resolve, and it makes the Premier League genuinely unpredictable for several seasons. Perhaps a few years outside the top flight is exactly the lesson a club of City’s stature needs. If the goal is to ensure the punishment has lasting impact, that is the more meaningful sanction.